点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
国家版权局在文博会期间举办“版权让文化生活更美好”主题展******
12月28日，第十八届中国（深圳）国际文化产业博览交易会（以下简称文博会）开幕，国家版权局首次作为主办单位之一，举办了“版权让文化生活更美好”主题展。中宣部副部长张建春在文博会主会场巡馆期间，到版权主题展调研。
主题展现场（本文图片由国家版权局 供图）
“版权让文化生活更美好”主题展以丰富的内容和新颖的形式，全面展示了党的十八大以来,在以习近平同志为核心的党中央坚强领导下,中国版权立法、版权保护、版权服务、版权国际交流合作、版权宣传教育助力提升中华文化事业繁荣发展方面取得的重大成就，为文博会现场观众更好了解版权的价值和意义提供了参考。
主题展重点回顾了《著作权法》实施30多年来，经过三次修订，形成了以《著作权法》为核心，行政法规、国际条约、部门规章、司法解释和地方性法规为组成部分，既与国际规则接轨，又具有中国特色，既适应市场经济要求，又体现新技术发展的完备的版权法律体系。特别是在党的十八大以来，我国深化版权司法审判领域改革，健全审判机构，强化审判监督指导，版权司法保护更加坚定有力，有效维护权利人的合法利益；各级版权行政管理部门坚持日常监管与专项行动相结合，探索运用技术手段，严厉打击各类侵权盗版行为，不断加大惩治力度。针对盗版音像制品以及北京冬奥会等重大活动开展专项整治，连续多年开展打击侵权盗版专项治理行动，版权执法监管力度不断加大，版权执法监管成效显著，为营造法治化、国际化、便利化的一流营商环境和有利于科技创新、文化繁荣的良好环境发挥了重要的保驾护航作用。
展台图片
“版权助力文化传承与蓬勃发展”部分重点展示了党的十八大以来，版权产业对国民经济的贡献逐步加大，出版物版权输出量持续增长，版权推动电影、音乐、文化娱乐、互联网等产业快速发展的成效。该部分还就国家版权局开展全国版权示范工作、打造全国版权展会授权交易体系、开展国家版权创新发展基地试点工作、进行全国作品和计算机软件著作权登记、设立著作权集体管理组织等全面推动版权运用和价值转化进行了展示。
“丰富多彩的版权宣传教育讲好中国版权故事”部分主要展示了自1991年《著作权法》颁布实施以来，中国先后批准加入了8个版权相关国际条约，包括推动视听产业发展的《视听表演北京条约》和世界上唯一一部版权领域的人权条约——《马拉喀什条约》。随着中国的版权国际影响力逐步增强，开展了版权保护优秀案例示范点调研项目，推动民间文艺版权保护国内立法和国际推广联动，助力中华优秀传统文化“传下去”“活起来”“走出去”。
版权主题展主办方表示，党的二十大擘画了以中国式现代化推进中华民族伟大复兴的宏伟蓝图，也为中国版权事业高质量发展提出了新任务、新要求。版权工作将坚持以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想为指导，围绕文化强国、知识产权强国、版权强国建设，不断激发文化创新创造活力，推动文化高质量发展，优化营商环境，促进国际交流合作，努力讲好中国版权故事，为社会主义文化新辉煌提供有力版权支撑。(赖名芳)
编辑：刘一文
审核：杨为民
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
（文图：赵筱尘 巫邓炎） [责编：天天中] 阅读剩余全文（）  视觉焦点
凤凰彩票地图 |
)